Our Time

Ship Ahoy

For Richmond's schools, success used to be spelled s-u-r-v-i-v-a-l.

Ship Ahoy

"Our Time" takes a deeper look at Richmond's future each Tuesday, only on Richmond.com.

Related Articles

More News & Features »

Philip Moeller
Richmond.com
Tuesday, August 19, 2008

The next Richmond School Superintendent must have strong educational credentials but success will hinge on administrative prowess and, especially, on powers of persuasion and people skills.

With November elections looming for Mayor, City Council and the School Board, it would be helpful to let the dust settle a bit and to have these new leaders in place before serious superintendent wooing commences.

It's possible a great candidate would be currently between jobs but it's more likely the best person is already in a school system somewhere else, and will have obligations to finish out the school year. Interim Superintendent Dr. Yvonne Brandon is extremely capable and 2008-09 programs are in place that will seek to build on recent gains in educational achievement.

George P. Braxton chairs the School Board and is not standing for re-election in the fall. Whatever you think of the job done by the nine current board members, they deserve our thanks for devoting enormous amounts of time to the effort and receiving in return a steady flow of criticism and assorted bumps and bruises. This is not a job for the faint of heart. In Braxton's case, he has a growing family and a more than full-time day job at LeClair Ryan, where he directs the law firm's recruiting and diversity efforts.

Braxton may be leaving the board but remains committed to the schools. He understands and accepts criticism of the schools' efforts but argues, with some passion, that critics might feel much differently if they'd occupied his vantage point during the past several years. One battle that must be waged, and won, is to shape public expectations for the schools that lead to stronger community engagement and support.

"We have to come to the realization, as harsh and brutal as it is, is that 70 percent of our students are in at-risk categories," he says, "and if you take maybe four or five schools out of our school system, that number probably goes up into the 90s. Are some of those schools excelling, and students at those schools excelling? Absolutely. Are students coming through the same academic program having very different experiences? Absolutely.

"People point at our completion rate of a little over 50 percent, between all the different ways you can complete a high school degree. They almost accuse the school system of doing something to run off 50 percent of the students. Well, we're no more running off 50 percent of the students than the average school district in the state is running off 30 percent, considering the completion rate is about 70 percent statewide."

Ironically, Braxton notes, the increasing criticism of the Richmond schools, particularly for lax administrative oversight and financial controls, is happening in part because the system is no longer in the kind of crisis it was several years ago. We can afford to criticize it today because we can afford to have higher standards and aspirations. This should be a good thing, but where the Richmond schools are concerned, the glass is half empty. A new superintendent will have a tough time succeeding unless that perception can be changed.

Departed Superintendent Dr. Deborah Jewell-Sherman was, in her defenders' eyes, pretty much run out of town by Mayor Doug Wilder. But fewer than 10 percent of the city's public schools were accredited as she assumed her post, and today more than 90 percent meet state standards. Don't be surprised if her efforts are recalled with growing fondness as time passes.

"We have been in a triage situation, and what we have really put the resources towards are educating students," Braxton says. "We were a school district [in 2002] that was ripe for takeover by the state. You're talking 10 percent of the schools accredited; 10 percent of the schools meeting a standard that was set by the state. That's an emergency situation. You have limited resources. Not to be facetious, but you have a choice. You're on a ship. It's sinking. You either upgrade the buffet or you put in pumps to keep it from sinking ...

"Today, the ship is afloat. Not blasting through the water. But the ship is afloat. The ship is not sinking. Now all of a sudden, it's like, well, can we move a little faster? Can we upgrade the buffet? Can we have movies? Can we have newer movies? All of a sudden, we're looking at things that the other vessels are providing, and we're saying, why can't we be there?

"These are 100-percent legitimate questions. And that's the step that we have to make. But, at some point, we had to stop sinking. But now, we're dealing with, and the next school board will have to deal with, what has been just about a half-decade of almost myopic focus on bringing the school district to a level of competency in terms of educating children. Now, we're saying, how do we get to the next level? How do we get to the point where more children are college-prepared, more children are workforce prepared, more children are ready to deal with an international marketplace? How do we get to that point?"

How, indeed? Tune in next week for some thoughts.

About the author -- Phil Moeller, a recovering newspaper journalist, is a communications consultant and writer in Richmond.

Want to know more about the future of Richmond, then check out the "Our Time" archives.


Printer Friendly Version  Email Article to a Friend  RSS Feeds


3 comments.
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

I enjoyed both Kim Bridges' and Concerned's comments. Richmond schools are improving and the challenge is immense but not impossible. The parents of children who do not achieve up to their potential in school should be held accountable. Not the police, not the teachers, not the principals, not the school board, mayor, city council or social workers. If you slap a child it is called child abuse, but if you ignore your parental duties and damn your children to a future flipping burgers or sweeping floors its called a god-given parental right. If a judge could make a parent attend detention with their child until the child's grades improved we would see a big turn around in our schools. Children need love and guidance from their parents. Parents who truly love their children don't let them fail in or drop out of school.


Kim Bridges - Email this User
8/19/2008 at 2:01:32 PM
Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

Thanks for giving both the historical and cultural context which is often missing in our discussions about public education in Richmond. Another context to keep in mind is the national one; as a board member I look frequently at the experiences of other urban school systems and find that Richmond is not unique in most of its challenges. We all have struggles with areas like achievement and attendance that stem from concentrated city poverty. But Richmond has positive attributes that many of our urban--and even suburban--peers do not. If we build on what's good and "borrow" what's working elsewhere we can move to the next level.

Thank you, also, for your recognition about that being a board member is not a cake walk. In my career, this role has, indeed, stood out for its challenges. But it's also one of the most engaging efforts I've been a part of. The cause is so worthwhile, and the outcomes of our work has tremendous potential to give opportunities to children from all walks of life. I had to think long and hard about running again to serve, but I knew I just had to, for two reasons: first, there is much work left to do, and second, the system is clearly at a tipping point that I wanted to be sure tips the right way. With new leadership, collaboration, and a continued focus on efficiency and acountability will come increasing community buy-in, and when the public is invested in its schools, there is no limit to what we can accomplish.


Richmond.com Article Feedback - Leave your comment today!

Schools schools schools. It is extremely difficult for a school or a teacher to teach kids that don't care. And the reason a lot, not all, but a lot of these kids in Richmond Public schools don’t care is because a lot of their parents don’t care. What can we do as a city to get these kids to take their education seriously? It all starts in Pre-kindergarten, preschool, etc. The first phase of this city wide school restructuring needs to happen at the elementary level; we need to step back and look at what it takes from the beginning to change the mentality of the underprivileged children. Quality education that starts at the age of 2 or 3 years may be the answer. In my mind I am contemplating what it would take to get these kids out of their current environment of thumping music, violent video games, drugs, booze, and consistent laziness and into an environment of honesty, integrity, motivation, and dreams. We can't just take all these kids out of their parents arms and stuff them into institutions. In my heart I would never want to do that, but a small part of me thinks that might be the only solution to some of these problems. The overwhelming outside influences these kids have outside of school ruin most of them from obtaining any type of meaningful education. A good friend of mine is a 4th grade teacher in the city. He says he can’t even get his best student’s to do homework. During parent teacher conferences no parent really shows up. The only people that typically do show up are these kid’s grandparents. He says he call the parents 5 or 6 times. The parents say that they are coming and then don’t show up. That type of home environment can't be teaching good habits. The big question is where do we draw the line? Where does the responsibility of government end? These are tough issues in a tough time. Unfortunately it is our responsibility to answer these tough questions. It might not make everyone happy, the answer might not seem to be the best answer at the time but to be successful we need to look at the big picture and how it will effect all of us over the long haul. The biggest problem is anyone who tries to answer these questions with the answer that would fix the problem for the long term will never be elected. We are a society who is obsessed with instant gratification. Until we can change this type of mindset we might not want to think this hard about anything anyways.



Name: *
E-Mail:
URL:
Comment: *
What is 2 + 2? *
To help protect against spam, please answer the above question

  

Disclaimer: Richmond.com reserves the right to edit and/or publish your contributions via e-mail, story comments, etc. Inappropriate comments will be subject to immediate removal without notice.

DominionServiceStrip08 - Dominion_Service_Co_strip08