A corporate coalition led by Dominion Energy’s chief executive wants the city to commit more than $165 million in property taxes from a pair of Dominion skyscrapers to potentially help pay down debt for a proposed $1 billion redevelopment of the area around the Richmond Coliseum.

The plan from Thomas F. Farrell II’s nonprofit development group — NH District Corp. — hinges on the creation of a tax-increment financing district, a zone where new tax revenue would be dedicated to paying off debt from the redevelopment project. The zones typically surround a small area where a project is occurring, but Farrell’s group wants the zone to extend about half a mile away solely to take advantage of Dominion properties near Sixth and Cary streets, according to documents obtained by the Richmond Times-Dispatch through a Freedom of Information Act request.

The towers — Dominion’s One James River Plaza building on Cary Street along with the utility’s new 20-story offices set to open next door in 2019 — would provide a projected $4.2 million to $7.7 million in new property taxes to the redevelopment annually beginning in 2021, totaling $165 million across three decades. The money would otherwise flow to the city’s general fund to pay for core services such as public safety and education. Ultimately the Richmond City Council must sign off on the plans.

“It’s up to the city administration and the mayor first to decide whether they want to go that route. ... We’re ultimately agnostic on this point,” Farrell said in an interview Saturday afternoon. “I don’t think it’s fair to say you’re taking [$165 million] away from other city services because the project itself will have excess income coming into the city.”

Farrell, who said neither he nor anyone in his family will have any financial interest in the project, said his involvement comes from a sense of civic responsibility. He said it’s just a coincidence that Dominion’s new tower is part of the proposal.

He said the money from the towers would help the city secure a better deal on financing, but the money likely wouldn’t be needed if the redevelopment succeeds.

“We’re going to infuse life back into that part of the city,” he said. “It’s going to create good-paying permanent jobs.”

NH District officials said the proposal, dated May 9, was a draft reflecting early negotiations. A timeline created by the group, which has been largely followed, calls for the City Council to consider the proposal in September and vote on it in December.

Council President Chris Hilbert said including the new tax money from the Dominion towers on the other side of downtown would be a nonstarter.

“If that is the proposal, that would not be palatable for me,” Hilbert said. “That would be a troubling structure.”

Millions in new property, meals, lodging and sales taxes collected in the special zone, along with new coliseum revenues, would underwrite the proposal, which calls for a new $220 million arena, 2,800 apartments and condominiums and a Hyatt brand hotel in a 10-block area north of Broad Street between Jackson Ward and the Virginia Commonwealth University medical campus. Private investment would pay for the cost of the commercial and residential development in the proposal.

Plans also call for the rehabilitation of the historic Blues Armory, a new GRTC Transfer plaza for bus riders, a VCU building and 176,000-square feet of street-level storefront space for new restaurants and shops.

The financial projections show the towers aren’t necessary for the project to work. But their inclusion in the tax zone, sometimes called a TIF, would lessen the financial risk and could allow the city to pay off its debt faster, according to NH District representatives.

“In our view, the inclusion of the Dominion Tower in the TIF is simply a beneficial business decision for the city — to pave the way to build a state-of-the-art arena that will attract outside investment and grow the commonwealth’s capital city,” NH District’s lawyers wrote to Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney’s administration in May.

The redevelopment is projected to bring as many as 21,000 jobs to the city, including 9,300 after construction is complete, according to a VCU Center for Urban and Regional Analysis report. The proposed redevelopment could have a $1.2 billion annual economic impact after construction, the report states.

The proposal could give the entity control of more than 21 acres of publicly owned land.

The TIF boundaries outlined in the proposal are the subject of ongoing negotiations between the city and NH District, Stoney said in an interview. Until negotiations conclude, that and other details in the group’s proposal are not set in stone.

“This is our project. This is not Dominion’s project. It’s not any other entity’s project. This is our project. This is my vision. … I don’t care if it’s Tom Farrell or Johnny on the street, if it does not benefit my city, this project will not move forward,” Stoney said.

***

In February, NH District submitted the lone proposal in response to a city request for proposals Stoney announced in November, months after Farrell’s group publicly expressed interest in spearheading a redevelopment centered around a new arena. The Stoney administration has, to date, deliberated behind closed doors.

The Times-Dispatch obtained NH District’s written responses to questions raised by the Stoney administration after its initial review of the group’s proposal, financial projections, a development timeline and other documents through a FOIA request for emails between the lawyers NH District retained and the city’s Department of Economic and Community Development.

The responses reveal some doubts from the city about some of the group’s assumptions and revenue projections. Stoney has commissioned a third-party analysis of the group’s figures by an out-of-town entity so the review is impartial.

“I wanted someone who was not tied to any of the entities that may be involved in the project,” Stoney said.

NH District projects the new arena will book 120 events annually and generate $3.7 million in revenue to help cover debt service payments in its first year in operation, and $5.8 million by its third year. The revenue projection includes annual money for naming rights, sponsorships, admissions taxes on ticket sales, sales and meals taxes on concessions sold to patrons and business license taxes.

The Stoney administration questioned the group’s revenue forecast, saying it appeared higher than figures from nine comparable arenas NH District pointed to in its original proposal. Those arenas made an average of $953,000 annually. The highest grossing venue brought in $2.9 million.

NH District wrote back to the city that the revenue figures for the comparable arenas did not fully account for money paid for naming rights or collected for parking at the venues. Some of the other venues also had anchor tenants that took cuts of overall operating revenue.

The absence of an anchor tenant at the new arena — the group’s proposal does not include one — could provide more flexibility in scheduling events throughout the year and preserve the new arena’s profit margins, the documents state.

The city is responsible for paying for a portion of the Greater Richmond Convention Center’s existing debt using the lodging taxes the city collects. Under the NH District plan, lodging taxes from the new 527-room hotel — $2.3 million in its first year in operation — could be diverted to pay the debt service on the project. The group said the new lodging taxes would be unnecessary for the city to cover its payment toward the GRCC debt.

“This incremental revenue is highly impactful to the arena bond repayment schedule,” the group stated in one of its written responses. “Without this annual revenue, debt service coverage ratios for the arena bonds drop below acceptable levels.”

Throughout its responses to the city, NH District maintains that new revenue generated by the redevelopment should be 1.5 times greater than the redevelopment’s debt annual service payments. For example, if the debt service payment is $10 million annually, the group wants annual revenue to equal or exceed $15 million.

Documents from NH District state the revenue-to-debt ratio is why it’s pushing to include the Dominion Energy properties in the special tax zone. With the Dominion skyscrapers, revenues will outpace the payments by the third year of repayment, according to the group’s financial projections, meaning investors will view it as a safe bet.

Without the towers, revenues are projected to cover the anticipated debt payment, but never outpace the payments at a high enough rate, meaning investors may view the redevelopment as a riskier proposition, leading to higher interest rates and higher costs in the long run, the documents state. Those higher costs would be borne by the city, an NH District representative said.

It is NH District’s expectation that the city would transfer the property targeted for redevelopment to the Richmond Economic Development Authority, the documents state. In that scenario, the EDA could lease the properties to NH District for a term of 99 years, and the group would pay ground lease payments on the properties to the city.

Another piece of the group’s financing for the proposal is the establishment of a special parking district in the redevelopment’s footprint. NH District projects between $5.5 million and $7.7 million annually in new revenue from visitor and resident parking in city-owned and operated decks.

Combined, the new taxes, parking money and operating revenue from the arena would cover the twice annual debt payments, according to the group’s financial projections. Those payments would begin in 2022, at $13.4 million annually, and increase to $28.2 million by 2048, the end of the repayment period.

Counting principal and interest, the debt service payments will tally $633 million between 2022 and 2048, according to the group’s financial projections. During that same period, NH District projects the redevelopment will net $375 million in surplus revenue that would flow to the city.

***

Representatives of NH District met with city leaders to discuss the proposal and a timeline for advancing it in May.

The meeting’s agenda was set by Davenport & Co. LLC, the city’s external financial adviser. About two dozen people from various entities working with NH District Corp. attended the meeting, which was held at the Hirschler Fleischer law offices on East Cary Street. Stoney was not present, he said.

Among the attendees: C.T. Hill, a retired SunTrust executive who is president of the NH District; top brass from Dominion, including Mark Mitchell, its vice president for generation construction, and Grant Neely, a onetime chief of staff for former Mayor Dwight C. Jones who is leading a communications team at the utility giant working to advance the proposal; Susan Eastridge, CEO of Concord Eastridge Inc., a Fairfax-based real estate development company; Dolly Vogt, regional general manager of SMG Richmond, which currently operates the Richmond Coliseum; and Burt Pinnock, a principal at Baskervill, a Richmond-based architecture firm.

The timeline laid out a goal to brief several city departments about NH District’s plans and set a schedule for additional public input on the proposal by the end of June. NH District representatives said the group will announce public meetings about the proposal in the coming weeks. On Saturday, the group launched a website that includes a section where subcontractors can apply to work on the project.

After an inquiry from The Times-Dispatch last month, the Stoney administration announced it would begin negotiating with the group. Stoney said in a statement that his administration would only move forward with the plan “if we determine it is in the best interests of the community.”

The administration told City Council members last month it would submit a package of ordinances advancing the proposal in September, Stoney said, consistent with a Sept. 10 deadline outlined in the timeline. The administration will adhere to the schedule only if NH District adjusts its plans to match the city’s expectations, Stoney said.

“At the end of the day, if [NH District] doesn’t meet some of terms that we have when we come to the table, then the project won’t move forward,” Stoney said. “I was very explicit to members of the City Council that I will not present ordinances to them that don’t meet the terms that we dictate.”

The timeline outlines a goal of securing council approval for the proposal by Dec. 1. Council approval is necessary before NH District can make its bond offering to investors, tentatively scheduled for January, the timeline shows.

In its responses to the city, NH District identified as a potential stumbling block the Federal Reserve’s intention to raise interest rates several times in the near future. The impending increases threatened the viability of the project’s financing, the group said, in what may be a glimpse into its strategy for swiftly securing council support for the complex deal.

“As more time passes, and before taking action and bringing the arena bonds to market, interest rates may rise to a level that could threaten the feasibility of the project in its current scope,” according to its written responses. “This may mean that either the bond issuance will result in lower proceeds available for building a new arena or more tax revenues will be needed to underwrite the bonds.”

If approved by the City Council, construction on housing in phase one of the redevelopment could begin in February, with a demolition of the Coliseum slated for March, according to the timeline.

NH District aims to break ground on the new arena as early as next August.

mrobinson@timesdispatch.com

(804) 649-6734

Twitter: @__MarkRobinson

Mark Robinson covers Richmond City Hall.

Recommended for you

Commenting is limited to Times-Dispatch subscribers. To sign up, click here.
If you’re already a subscriber and need to activate your access or log in, click here.

(14) comments

ED CHRISTINA

15 years ago this might bnot have been such a bad idea, but that area is booming now. They are asking for tax money to develope a booming area? The city could tear down the colesium and put in a brewery , sell the left over land to people who DONT want tax breaks like this, and make out much better. This seems like a really bad deal for the city. the Skins ripped us off, Bon
Secors ripped us off, Stone Brewing ripped us off, I hope Mayor Stoney is better able to see the pitfalls. The worst one is that none of the big "benefactors" ever live up to the promises they make, how many times do we have to get burned before we learn?

BRUCE MILAM

most of the planned buildings that the venture will finance are public buildings. its difficult to make a buck on those. even the most positive projections for the new coliseum have an annual return of about 3% on the $200M cost for it. Not a good investment for smart players. So whats the lure for this team of developers that brought them forward with a proposal but no others? Their civic pride for one, but also the TIF financing minimizes their risk. It'll take smarter people than me to quantify the benefits vs reward of tieing in the two Dominion Energy Towers, but the concept is intriguing and shouldn't be cast aside without close examination.

As for the size, its a tad bigger than JPJ, which sells out regularly in a smaller market for shows and events. The ACC and Big Ten don't even care about DC's Verizon Center anymore. They've moved to bigger arenas and domed stadiums.

PAT LEVY-LAVELLE

“Not a good investment for smart players.“

I hope that the City wisely declines and thus proves itself a smart player.

Not to mention that basic services (e.g. schools) desperately need more funding, from which this is an unjustified distraction.

Ron Melancon

Don’t you find it odd thst these corporations ensure that Richmond will never be in competition to attract the Eastern Regional NCAA tournament,? The Capitol one center in a Washington has 18,500 seating capacity and already tickets are selling for over 500 dollars each. It’s amazing we are considering building this and these corporate executives are in Collusion not to bring venue competition against the Capitol One Center in Washington DC. We have the hotel capacity and we have better transportation than DC.

Robert Moffett

Tom Farrell knows full well that the purpose of real property taxes is to pay for fire, police, EMS, roads, education, utility infrastructure and other necessary municipal services of which a coliseum is not one. Furthermore, he surely knows that these services in Richmond are inadequately funded and highly deficient. For him to assume that he, as Dominion's CEO, has a right to dictate that Dominion's property taxes be diverted from the essential municipal services for which they are intended, is more than just cause for Dominion's stockholders to demand his immediate resignation. If Farrell and Dominion are unwilling to pay for the essential municipal services necessitated by their presence in Richmond, then it is time for them to move elsewhere. I encourage fellow Dominion stockholders to contact Farrell to voice our opposition to his ignoring the well-known financial needs of Richmond as respect education, infrastructure, and essential municipal services.

Ron Melancon

Why don’t we simply have a 2 dollar add on fee for anybody who leaves Richmond airport and comes into Richmond Airport. That is 4 dollars per ticket times how many are using the airport and all of this Behind the door scam and special favors will not be needed. One tax and and no 3 card Monte games will be needed. Once again our leaders are bought off like this

JEROME FRAWLEY

Bringing up that failed idea again. Remember when you wanted that money put into a special independant fund ran by Rn Melancon n order to build a new ball field? Nice try at another faield repetitive agenda.

STEVEN PRICE

Richmond's airport is in Henrico County. I'm not sure that Richmond can levy taxes on it.

LAURA LEMMON

Under the NH District plan, lodging taxes from the new 527-room hotel — $2.3 million in its first year in operation — could be diverted to pay the debt service on the project.” That is 527 rooms rented 365 days @ $150 each. Wildly optimistic revenue projections not met means debt will be paid from the general fund. Taking money from the very things it was to benefit.

LINDA FREEMAN

Why does this mayor continue to refuse to focus on what really matters to the future of this city: the schools and the students who attend them?

PAT LEVY-LAVELLE

The City has done way too many sweetheart deals and ignored or underfunded basic services. If this group wants to fund it -- NOT divert tax money to it (public financing) -- then we can think about it. Thanks to Chris Hilbert and others who will say "no" to the terrible idea of routing public money to this, rather than to the schools and other basics.

Ron Melancon

Be very afraid .... no wounder our power bills are going up. It takes a rocket scientist not even a nuclear engineer from North Korea can figure out our electric bills. So much total junk in it ....

MARK WITTKOFSKI

How about Dominion just build this project instead of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, and they would save $5 Billion in the process and not destroy 600 miles of beautiful scenery!

JANE BALLARD

I second that!

Welcome to the discussion.

Please keep it clean, turn off CAPS LOCK and don't threaten anyone. Be truthful, nice and proactive. Comments cannot be edited or deleted once posted. To flag a comment to the page administrator, click “report” next to that comment.

You must be a digital subscriber to view this article.