Richmond City Hall

Richmond City Hall

Homeowners faced with soaring tax assessments could opt for temporary relief under a new program the Richmond City Council will consider.

Councilwoman Kimberly Gray, who represents the 2nd District, introduced a measure this week that would allow owners to defer a portion of the property taxes they owe the city if their assessments rise at least 10 percent from the previous year.

For example, if a property was previously assessed at $200,000 and jumped to $230,000, the owner could defer payment on the taxes owed for $10,000 of the property’s value under the program. At the city’s current tax rate of 1.20 per $100 of value, that would amount to $120 in taxes.

“It is intended to help families who are either on a fixed income or have modest means that own a home in areas that are seeing a lot of development and land values are going up at a very rapid rate,” Gray said.

More than 18,000 property owners would be eligible for the program, according to a council staff analysis of data on the current tax year made available by the City Assessor’s Office.

The program would take into account growth only from the previous tax year, rather than locking in an assessment level.

If all homeowners who qualify for the program opted in, the city could defer a projected $2.7 million in property tax revenue annually, though Gray said she does not expect all would take advantage of it.

To qualify for the deferral program, a homeowner would have to live in the property for two years, owe no back taxes, and agree to pay 2 percent interest on the deferred amount when they settle with the city. Owners would be required to pay the full amount deferred plus interest when they sell the property.

The measure comes shortly after some homeowners saw steep increases in assessments the city sent out at end of June. The average home value rose 8.3 percent, from $228,000 to $247,000. The bump means the average tax bill will go up $228 when the city mails them to property owners early next year.

“You can’t plan for those increases,” Gray said.

In some areas, the spike was even more dramatic. More than two dozen neighborhoods saw assessments increase by double digits, according to the assessor’s office. Among them: Woodland Heights, Scott’s Addition, Manchester, Providence Park, Oakwood, Carver and Oregon Hill.

Richmond’s real estate tax rate — $1.20 per $100 of value — is the highest in the region. The rate per $100 is 95 cents in Chesterfield County, 87 cents in Henrico County and 81 cents in Hanover County.

Laura Lafayette, chairwoman of the Maggie Walker Community Land Trust and CEO of the Richmond Association of Realtors, said Gray’s proposal would provide aid for financially strapped homeowners without resulting in lost revenue for the city.

“It seems to strike a balance between the relief that a taxpayer needs in the here and now to enable them to stay in place and making sure that the city doesn’t permanently forgo that income,” Lafayette said.

Greta Harris, president and CEO of the Better Housing Coalition, said she believed the deferral program merited consideration as a piece of a larger effort to address housing affordability in the city and region.

“I think what Councilwoman Gray is proposing could be helpful for people in the moderate-income spectrum,” Harris said.

Commercial properties, many of which also saw steep increases in their taxable value, would not be eligible for the deferrals.

If the council approves the program, it could take effect in July 2019, at the start of the next fiscal year. The Department of Finance would administer the program. John Wack, its director, said he was concerned about the additional workload the program would place on the department, but added the administration had not yet analyzed its full impact.

The council’s Finance and Economic Development Standing Committee is scheduled to weigh Gray’s ordinance at its next meeting, scheduled for Thursday.

mrobinson@timesdispatch.com

(804) 649-6734

Twitter: @__MarkRobinson

Mark Robinson covers Richmond City Hall.

Recommended for you

Commenting is limited to Times-Dispatch subscribers. To sign up, click here.
If you’re already a subscriber and need to activate your access or log in, click here.

(10) comments

JEROME FRAWLEY

Athlete should be a law that no municipality gains any additional revenue from an asssment. If that happens the tax rate should automatically be rolled back so the income is what it was before the assessment. Then he governing council should be required to set, after posting and public discussion, a new higher tax rate if needed.

Fred Demey

The problem is not a that a Deferral is needed, it is that taxes are way, WAY too high to begin with. What this political hack, and the rest of the lousy, slimy Richmond politicians need to do is cut taxes, then this wouldn't be a problem, but try keeping these Democratic Socialists in Richmond from stealing more of the taxpayers money........... isn't going to happen, vote them all out and replace them with people like President Trump, he is solving these kind of problems at the Federal level, and like minded people could solve the problems in Richmond.

Brian King

It isn’t welfare because the tax credit is returned with 2% interest when the property is sold. With welfare the money is distributed and never returned. The bigger question is “Should government give financial incentives?” “What is the ROI with those incentives?” Manchester is already in demand, why’s should the City provide incentives to those developers.

TURK STIES

The increase in residential real estate assessments causes an unwarranted increase in revenues for city government. Does our mayor expect us to believe that when housing costs increase by 10%, then city government needs 10% more tax revenue. Why? How many houses is the city planning to buy? Those higher assessments are a windfall profit for the city. An abusive tax increase whenever city council does not adopt the rollback tax rate for real estate. The problem homeowners face with higher taxes on higher assessments is caused by greed. Why would City Hall control spending and reduce waste when it can just reach deeper into our wallets and purses? The mayor will grab every dollar in our wallets if there is no law to stop him. We don't need a new council paper to delay when we pay the gouge, we need a council that will work to control ever climbing costs of uncontrolled city government spending. It sure feels like the taxpayers are being ripped off by those we elected to serve us.

Ron Melancon

Why? Don’t they need revenue for schools? We all know that if they don’t like the taxes the people need to demand lowing the tax rate stop playing games

TRACY PETERS

Rather than starting another welfare program, a better program would be to stop some of the spending that is not necessary and lower the tax rate and give everyone a break. Duh ….. and period.

JANE BALLARD

So developers shouldn’t try to improve blighted neighborhoods without forcing out longtime residents not able to pay much higher assessment rates? The developers aren’t spending public money, and older homeowners should be forced out if their homes, which are often paid for?

TRACY PETERS

Jane …. welfare is welfare, regardless of who, or the why. Your house is worth $10,000 more dollars and you say everyone but you should pay the tax? ….. Besides, I didn’t think poor folks owned homes …. period.

AUGUST KELLER

Why didn't the longtime residents improve the neighborhood or why did they allow them to become blighted?

Fred Demey

Yep, Tracy, that's how to solve the problem, but trying to get the Democratic Socialist government in Richmond to lower taxes will be almost impossible.

Welcome to the discussion.

Please keep it clean, turn off CAPS LOCK and don't threaten anyone. Be truthful, nice and proactive. Comments cannot be edited or deleted once posted. To flag a comment to the page administrator, click “report” next to that comment.

You must be a digital subscriber to view this article.