Photo for July 10 EDIT2

The Richmond Coliseum has seen better days.

Thanks to some excellent digging by The Times-Dispatch newsroom, with a little help from the Freedom of Information Act, Richmonders have a more detailed idea about plans to replace the city’s aging Coliseum and revitalize the neighborhood around it. On Sunday, RTD reporter Mark Robinson outlined an ambitious project under consideration by the city to build a $220 million, 17,500-seat arena. The building would up Richmond’s profile for concerts and sporting events — without tapping the city’s revenue or debt capacity.

Just as important, the new arena would serve as a catalyst for private development in the blocks surrounding the 47-year-old Coliseum — an area that is largely an urban wasteland today. Much of the land is city-owned and provides minimal tax revenue. The idea — and it’s a sound one, though certainly not risk-free — is to pay the debt service on the arena using tax revenue generated by nearby private development, which would include a hotel as well as commercial, retail, and residential space.

It’s a bold and well-conceived plan for an area in the heart of downtown that has been in decline for far too long. And it’s hard to think of any past project in the city that presents as much opportunity as does this one — for lifestyle enhancement, job creation, and attractive affordable urban housing. We are encouraged by the imagination, original thinking, and careful preparation that has marked the planning stages. That includes an innovative idea about using future revenue from the new Dominion tower a few blocks away as potential source of revenue to finance the arena — as a means to make the financing package more attractive to investors.

Except for the construction of the arena and the refurbishment of the historic city-owned Blues Armory, all development will be financed by private companies. Bondholders will bear the risk for the public construction costs.

The nonprofit organization that’s leading the way — NH District Corp., headed by Dominion CEO Tom Farrell — deserves credit for laying a credible foundation for an exciting large-scale project, as does Mayor Levar Stoney, for setting the process in motion. The developer and the mayor now have to negotiate the details to ensure the city’s finances and taxpayers are adequately protected as they work to revive a badly neglected part of the city.

Commenting is limited to Times-Dispatch subscribers. To sign up, click here.
If you’re already a subscriber and need to activate your access or log in, click here.

(6) comments

PAT LEVY-LAVELLE

Terrible plan - fund the schools, not sweetheart deals. Reject this, Richmond.

St. George Pinckney

without tapping the city’s revenue or debt capacity." but just taking tax money from specific properties!

Liar, liar, pants on fire. Warren Buffett: Shut down your false press.

STEVEN PRICE

The Colisseum was built to eliminate a blighted area adjacent to property owned by the Bliley family. Payment of the bonds issued to finance it and the newly constructed city hall absorbed 5% of the city's budget.

It's deja vu all over again.

KENNETH BRADFORD

True. There is such a thing as a free lunch -- if somebody else pays for it.

GEORGE SNEAD

I applaud this bold project, but I DO have a problem with specifically allocating real estate taxes from Dominion Energy buildings to help fund the deal, and then somehow make the claim that no public money is involved. That's dishonest.

STEVEN PRICE

George Snead - Money derived from taxing one building is indistinguishable from money derived from taxing any other building. Dishonest is a charitable description of the claim that it can be otherwise.

Welcome to the discussion.

Please keep it clean, turn off CAPS LOCK and don't threaten anyone. Be truthful, nice and proactive. Comments cannot be edited or deleted once posted. To flag a comment to the page administrator, click “report” next to that comment.

You must be a digital subscriber to view this article.