By C.T. Hill and Pamela Royal
As longtime advocates for the city of Richmond, we know there is a lot of work to be done to build a more equitable and just future for our city. Education, affordable housing, workforce development and social justice advocates, like ourselves, are all looking to solve the funding and services challenges that are top of mind for our entire community.
Because of these challenges, you often hear that we can’t have better schools and a new downtown, but just one or the other. We need to shift our perspective and think beyond this “either-or” mentality.
There is a better way — one that benefits all Richmonders and generates revenue for schools and city services at the same time.
That improves our transit options and fundamentally transforms our tourism economy. That addresses historical displacement with a historic investment in affordable housing and minority workforce development and minority business participation.
The Navy Hill development project, which we support as board members of the NH Foundation, is something new for Richmond. It’s a careful, inclusive and progressive plan to create jobs and affordable housing, build a world-class arena that will transform our tourism economy, attract new business and generate surplus revenue for schools, city services, public safety and affordable housing without raising taxes.
Our plan will create opportunities for the Richmond of today, and the Richmond of tomorrow. And here’s how:
Navy Hill is rooted in private investment from investors who see the promise in revitalizing Richmond’s downtown. Most of the $1.5 billion development is no different from the construction in Scott’s Addition or Manchester.
Private investors will buy the land from Richmond (creating new money for the city) and will invest their dollars to create buildings in Navy Hill.
They get paid back when the buildings are built, open and ready for business.
Private purchase of city lands creates immediate, direct revenue that wouldn’t otherwise exist. And the taxes generated by private development creates direct revenue that wouldn’t otherwise exist. That’s direct revenue to the city, not trickle-down promises.
But this private investment also goes one step further. It creates enough tax revenue to replace the coliseum — which is costing the city money while closed — with a brand-new arena and $1 billion to fund city priorities: from Richmond Public Schools ($500 million) and city services ($340 million), to housing and homeless services ($150 million), and the arts ($10 million).
The projects of years’ past that didn’t materialize relied on money from taxpayers. In this project, taxpayers don’t pay a single cent in new taxes. No existing money is taken from the city’s general fund.
Instead, as buildings rise from within the designated area, as people move into homes within the area, as companies grow in the area and as jobs are created in the area, the value of the area will increase — and so will the tax revenue it creates.
These new tax dollars, over and above the current value — which wouldn’t otherwise exist — will be used to pay back bond holders who supported construction of the arena, which remains a public asset. And it spurs additional economic growth by contributing to city funds for schools, roads and other city services.
Unlike deals of the past, the city won’t be left on the hook — that risk stays with private investors.
Consider the alternative of doing nothing. If we do nothing, these vacant city blocks will continue to sit empty, and there won’t be $1.3 billion in private investment in our downtown.
The aging coliseum will deteriorate and tourism in our city will slip away. We won’t create new money for schools, nor will we create thousands of jobs. We would simply get to keep the empty parking lots.
We know and love this city, just like you. We believe passionately that if we come together and say yes, then we are looking at a brighter future for Richmond.
We will be sending a message to our children and grandchildren that we’re building communities where they can live, work and play for generations.
Post a comment as
Report
Watch this discussion.
(7) comments
As a banking executive, C T Hill surely must understand that Richmond's essential municipal services are underfunded, badly neglected, and highly deficient. That, alone, suggests that tax revenue must be prioritized to remedy them - the NH proposal will divert millions in badly needed revenue from essential services to NH debt services and should be rejected. If Hill, Farrell, and Dr. Royal are so convinced that the NH plan is viable they should proceed with it using their own fund and no tax revenue should be used for it.
Really wish RTD would stop running advertisements on its Opinion pages.... because this isn't an opinion, it's a sales pitch, nothing more.
Sorry, this argument that the new arena will bring tourists is simply dumb. Tourists come to Richmond because it is the capital city, because of the history and sadly they came because of our beautiful architecture and neighborhoods. Sadly because so much has been lost to development as our streetscapes have been transformed by the Convention Center, high rises on the canal among other monstrosities. And by the way, the city closed the Coliseum and stopped doing maintenance in the service of the Navy Hill project. I don't think its either or but I really don't believe that the city will not be on the hook for this project. You are proposing a tax incentive system that will tie up tax revenue from an 80 block area for 30 years! This is public money on the hook, this is money that would have gone to the general fund for as you will know, some new buildings are already occupied. You were not elected to our City government and neither was Tom Farrell, you should not be deciding tax policy or anything else.
Ms. Keller, they were proposing ideas, which obviously you disagree with. They weren't "deciding" anything.
Excuse me but seems like everyone want Richmond to have that "world class" look to it... But as long as its roads look like 3rd world roads that image won't sell... Time to bring up the back of the pack before moving forward... BTW, I have been in just about every other Southern city and no other city has worse roads... And it's not close... Fix the roads and then talk about making Richmond "world class"... ~~~ Bob
It isn't just the roads that are 3rd world Bob, the city is infested with crime, both inside and outside the government, the taxes are sky high, services like schools, virtually non-existent, and REALLY 3rd world, and much more. Richmond is a garbage pit, has been for decades, and it has been run almost exclusively by Democrats.......Bob, you see the pattern here?, yea, this whole project will be picked apart and trashed, unless it lines the appropriate people's pockets.
Bob Harrison - Does this sound like driving in Richmond? "Once you get off the main highways, it's common to find potholes, dropoffs, dirt roads, and other hazards." Actually it is from Wikitravel and describes driving in Mexico.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Please keep it clean, turn off CAPS LOCK and don't threaten anyone. Be truthful, nice and proactive. Comments cannot be edited or deleted once posted. To flag a comment to the page administrator, click “report” next to that comment.