young woman smoking

Let’s be honest: Richmond needs a cigarette tax. On three occasions since 2014, separate task forces, assembled with many of the best minds in our area, have recommended this revenue source to the City Council as one of the only untapped sources of funds the city can receive today without seeking General Assembly approval. Such funds could be used now, immediately, for the maintenance and renovations of our public school facilities that continue to worsen and become more costly with delay. A cigarette tax is also good public health policy.

The first federal tobacco tax was enacted in 1864 to help raise revenue during the Civil War. During the Korean War in 1951, when 45 percent of the adult population in the United States smoked, the federal cigarette tax was increased to 8 cents per pack. It has been $1.01 since 2009.

All 50 states have a cigarette tax, ranging from 17 cents to $4.35 per pack. The average state tax is $1.72. Yet, Virginia has the second lowest tax at 30 cents per pack, and it’s been more than a decade since this rate was established under Gov. Mark Warner.

Today, 92 localities in Virginia impose a local cigarette tax. These rates range from 5 cents per pack to $1.15, with the median rate for cities being 42 cents. This accounts for 1.2 percent of the total tax revenue collected in Virginia cities. In FY2017, Newport News raised $4.8 million in revenue from an 85-cents-per-pack cigarette tax. Norfolk earned $7.5 million with the same rate. If Richmond implemented a rate of 80 cents per pack it could generate $5.3 million each year.

Implementing a cigarette tax now is more critical, given that the additional 1.5 percent meals tax approved in February is being dedicated solely to new construction of four schools and is not funding maintenance of the remaining 40 properties. Mayor Levar Stoney’s proposed FY19 budget before City Council only recommends $1.5 million for school maintenance of these other buildings, 80 percent of which are more than 20 years old. That’s only 33 cents per square foot — not even 10 percent of the $3.40 industry average per square foot for school maintenance. A dedicated cigarette tax would cut this deficit in half and raise an additional $1.17 per square foot of maintenance funding.

Furthermore, Superintendent Jason Kamras has requested $14 million in FY19 to fund HVAC replacement and maintenance. Such needs for our schools cannot go unanswered by the City Council. Didn’t we just experience a similar crisis with residents in Richmond Redevelopment & Housing Authority who went months without adequate heat?

It’s this historically low rate of school maintenance that has gotten Richmond into its current crisis with school facilities. According to the 2016 Bellwether Education Partners report, Richmond must “increase focus in preventative maintenance to reduce high-cost expenses,” and “proactive management of ongoing maintenance” will reduce operating costs. Simply put, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. We can’t keep deferring maintenance of our school buildings as we seek to modernize and replace them for the 21st century. We must do both.

Opponents of the cigarette tax reject it as a dwindling revenue stream. That’s undeniable. However, it is available now and for the foreseeable future. The kids can’t wait another generation to have all of our schools properly maintained to provide clean and safe places to learn. Richmond can’t keep digging a bigger hole to hide in. We must adopt a cigarette tax now.

Parker Agelasto represents the 5th District on the Richmond City Council. He is married to a former Richmond Public School teacher and has a 1-year-old daughter. Contact him at

Commenting is limited to Times-Dispatch subscribers. To sign up, click here.
If you’re already a subscriber and need to activate your access or log in, click here.

Load comments

You must be a full digital subscriber to read this article You must be a digital subscriber to view this article.